4.4 Article

Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, Antimicrobial and Anti-Proliferative Activities of Essential Oils of Rosmarinus officinalis from five Different Sites in Palestine

Journal

SEPARATIONS
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/separations9110339

Keywords

Rosmarinus officinalis L.; essential oils; GC-MS analysis; antioxidant; antibacterial; antifungal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical profiles of Rosmarinus officinalis L. essential oils collected from different regions in Palestine were analyzed and their antioxidant and antibacterial activities were evaluated. The results showed that the essential oils from the Jenin region exhibited the highest antioxidant activity and the greatest antibacterial activity against MRSA, S. aureus, E. coli, K. pneumonia, and P. vulgaris. These findings suggest the potential use of Rosemary essential oils as natural antioxidants and antibacterial agents.
The chemical profiles of Rosmarinus officinalis L. essential oils, collected from five distinct geographical regions in Palestine, were determined using GC-MS. The major phytochemical classes of R. officinalis EOs were monoterpene hydrocarbon (24.81-78.75%) and oxygenated monoterpenoids (19.01-73.78%), with 1,8-cineole (4.81-37.83%), alpha-pinene (13.07-51.36%), and camphor (11.95-24.30%) being the most abundant components of the studied oils. Using the DPPH assay, the antioxidant activity of EOs revealed that EO from the Jenin region had the highest antioxidant activity, with an IC50 value of 10.23 +/- 0.11 mu g/mL, followed by samples from Tulkarm (IC50 = 37.15 +/- 2.3 mu g/mL) and Nablus (IC50= 38.9 +/- 0.45 mu g/mL). With MICs of 12.5, 12.5, 6.25, 6.25, and 6.25 mu g/mL against MRSA, S. aureus, E. coli, K. pneumonia, and P. vulgaris, respectively, the EO extracted from the Jenin region of Palestine had the greatest antibacterial activity. Furthermore, EOs from Jenin and Nablus demonstrated stronger anti-candida action than the pharmaceutical formulation Fluconazole, with MICs of 0.781, 0.781, and 1.56 mu g/mL, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available