4.7 Article

Antigenotoxic and Antimutagenic Potentials of Proline in Allium cepa Exposed to the Toxicity of Cadmium

Journal

AGRICULTURE-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture12101568

Keywords

comet assay; chromosomal aberrations; DNA damage; cadmium; proline

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Oradea, Romania

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates the potential of proline as an osmoprotectant to alleviate the genotoxic effects caused by cadmium exposure in plants. The results show that the application of proline before or after cadmium treatment reduces DNA damage and chromosomal aberrations.
This study was conducted to evaluate whether the application of proline as a potential osmoprotectant at different doses could improve the genotoxic and mutagenic effects caused by plant exposure to cadmium salts. For this purpose, the Comet assay was used, which allows the rapid detection of DNA damage shortly after its occurrence, before the DNA is repaired, as well as the discrimination of the DNA damage limited to specific cells in a heterogeneous population. After treatment of Allium cepa roots with 75 mu M CdSO4 center dot H2O (Cd sample), a DNA percentage of 35.24% was recorded in the tail. In the samples treated first with proline and then with cadmium (pre-treatment group), the percentage DNA in the tail was reduced by 24.8% compared with the Cd sample. Instead, in the post-treatment group (samples treated first with cadmium and then with proline), the percentage DNA in the tail was reduced by 69.04% compared with the Cd sample. All cadmium treatments induced chromosomal aberrations (CAs). Compared with the CAs values obtained after Cd treatment, the reduction was 75.6% in the pre-treatment group and 55.39% in the post-treatment group. The results of this study highlighted that exogenous application of proline alleviated the genotoxic effect of cadmium.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available