4.3 Article

Evaluation of neon focused ion beam milling for TEM sample preparation

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROSCOPY
Volume 264, Issue 1, Pages 59-63

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jmi.12416

Keywords

FIB; GFIS; ion milling; LMIS; sample preparation; TEM

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation CMMI/MoM program under GOALI Grant [1235610]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. NSF grant from Major Research Instrumentation Program (NSF) [DMR-1338139]
  4. Biomolecular Nanotechnology Center/QB3 at the University of California, Berkeley
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1338139] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1235610] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Materials Research [1338139] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gallium-based focused ion beams generated from liquid-metal sources are widely used in micromachining and sample preparation for transmission electron microscopy, with well-known drawbacks such as sample damage and contamination. In this work, an alternative (neon) focused ion beam generated by a gas field-ionization source is evaluated for the preparation of electron-transparent specimens. To do so, electron-transparent sections of Si and an Al alloy are prepared with both Ga and Ne ion beams for direct comparison. Diffraction-contrast imaging and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy are used to evaluate the relative damage induced by the two beams, and cross-sections of milled trenches are examined to compare the implantation depth with theoretical predictions from Monte Carlo simulations. Our results show that for the beam voltages and materials systems investigated, Ne ion beam milling does not significantly reduce the focused ion beam induced artefacts. However, the Ne ion beam does enable more precise milling and may be of interest in cases where Ga contamination cannot be tolerated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available