4.6 Article

Exploratory meta-analysis of hypoxic transcriptomes using a precise transcript reference sequence set

Journal

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE LLC
DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202201518

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gene expression studies can be biased due to external information, but this can be overcome using data-driven analysis. The FANTOM CAGE-Associated Transcriptome project provides a comprehensive meta-assembly of the human transcriptome and was used to evaluate the differential response of various transcripts to hypoxia. The study revealed down-regulation of genes associated with ncRNA metabolism in response to hypoxia.
Gene expression studies are intrinsically biased, with many studies influenced by concomitant information such as gene-disease associations. This limitation can be overcome using a data-driven analysis approach without relying on ancillary information. The FANTOM CAGE-Associated Transcriptome project provides a comprehensive meta-assembly of the human transcriptome using coding and noncoding genes. Hypoxia strongly influences gene expression; in addition, noncoding RNA (ncRNA) metabolism is down-regulated in response to hypoxic stimuli. We evaluated the differential response of various transcripts to hypoxia by determining their hypoxia responsiveness scores. Enrichment analysis revealed that several genes associated with ncRNA metabolism, particularly those involved in ribosomal RNA processing, were down-regulated in response to hypoxia. Previously published information from the FANTOM CAGE-Associated Transcriptome project was suitable for metaanalysis of the transcriptome sequencing data from both coding and ncRNAs and to evaluate the hypoxia responsiveness of target transcripts and relationship between sense-antisense transcripts from the same locus. Our results may facilitate functional annotation of various transcripts including ncRNAs, allowing for both sense and antisense and coding and noncoding evaluations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available