4.3 Article

Epidemiology of distal radius fractures: a detailed survey on a large sample of patients in a suburban area

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s10195-022-00663-6

Keywords

Isolated distal radius fractures; Distal radius fractures epidemiology; Distal forearm fractures; AO classification; Distal radius fractures trauma mechanisms

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are more prevalent in females, with increasing incidence in older age groups, and no seasonal predisposition. Low-energy trauma occurring at home is the main cause of fractures in younger males, while sports trauma is a major cause in older males. Complete articular fractures are the most common type of fracture, with 2R3A2.2 being the most frequent subtype.
Background Literature lacks data on correlations between epidemiology and clinical data of patients with distal radius fractures (DRFs). Aim The aim of this study was to present a detailed epidemiologic survey of a large consecutive series of patient with DRFs. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 827 consecutive patients (579 females, 248 men) who sustained a DRFs in the last 5 years. All fractures were radiographically evaluated. DRFs were classified according to Association of Osteosynthesis classification. Data on age, gender, side, period in which fracture occurred, and fracture mechanism were collected. Statistical analysis was performed. Results The patients' mean age was 60.23 [standard deviation (SD) 16.65] years, with the left side being most frequently involved (56.1%). The mean age of females at the time of fracture was significantly higher than that of males. The most frequent pattern of fracture was the complete articular fracture (64.3%), while the most represented fracture type was 2R3A2.2 (21.5%). Regarding the period in which the fracture occurred, 305 DRFs (37.5%) were observed in the warmer months and 272 (33.4%) in the colder months. Low-energy trauma occurring outside home was found to be the major cause of DRF throughout the year. In both genders, trauma mechanism 2 was more frequent (59.4% F; 31.9% M; p < 0.01). A bimodal distribution of fracture mechanisms was found in males when considering the patient's age with a high-energy mechanism of fracture (3 and 4), identified in 21% (n = 52) of males aged 18-45 years, and a low-energy mechanism (1 and 2) was observed in 39.9% (n = 99) of males aged > 45 years. A significant correlation between all trauma mechanisms (from 1 to 6) and different fracture patterns (complete, partial, and extraarticular) was found (p value < 0.001). The mean age of patients with extraarticular fractures (mean age 61.75 years; SD 18.18 years) was higher than that of those with complete (mean age 59.84 years; SD 15.67 years) and partial fractures (mean age 55.26 years; SD 18.31 years). Furthermore, considering different fracture patterns and patient age groups, a statistically significant difference was found (p < 0.001). Conclusions DRFs have a higher prevalence in females, an increase in incidence with older age, and no seasonal predisposition. Low-energy trauma occurring at home is the main cause of fracture among younger males sustaining fractures after sports trauma; Complete articular is the most frequent fracture pattern, while 2R3A2.2 is most frequent fracture type.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available