4.7 Review

Biosensors and Drug Delivery in Oncotheranostics Using Inorganic Synthetic and Biogenic Magnetic Nanoparticles

Journal

BIOSENSORS-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bios12100789

Keywords

magnetic nanoparticles; biogenic magnetic nanoparticles; magnetotactic bacteria; magnetosomes; biosensors; drug delivery; oncotheranostics

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [22-15-00240]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81961138009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review summarizes the applications, properties, and advantages of synthetic and biogenic magnetic nanoparticles in oncological theranostics. Biogenic particles exhibit lower toxicity and better in vivo application potential.
Magnetic nanocarriers have attracted attention in translational oncology due to their ability to be employed both for tumor diagnostics and therapy. This review summarizes data on applications of synthetic and biogenic magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) in oncological theranostics and related areas. The basics of both types of MNPs including synthesis approaches, structure, and physicochemical properties are discussed. The properties of synthetic MNPs and biogenic MNPs are compared with regard to their antitumor therapeutic efficiency, diagnostic potential, biocompatibility, and cellular toxicity. The comparative analysis demonstrates that both synthetic and biogenic MNPs could be efficiently used for cancer theranostics, including biosensorics and drug delivery. At the same time, reduced toxicity of biogenic particles was noted, which makes them advantageous for in vivo applications, such as drug delivery, or MRI imaging of tumors. Adaptability to surface modification based on natural biochemical processes is also noted, as well as good compatibility with tumor cells and proliferation in them. Advances in the bionanotechnology field should lead to the implementation of MNPs in clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available