4.7 Review

Detection of Alpha-Fetoprotein Using Aptamer-Based Sensors

Journal

BIOSENSORS-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bios12100780

Keywords

Alpha-fetoprotein; detection; aptamer; optical biosensors; electrochemical biosensors

Funding

  1. Jiangsu Maternal and Child Health Research Project [F202144]
  2. Jiangsu Province and Education Ministry Co-sponsored Synergistic Innovation Center of Modern Agricultural Equipment of China [XTCX2026]
  3. National Foreign Experts Program Project of China [G2022014094L, DL2022014006L]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses two types of aptamer-based AFP detection methods, optical and electrochemical biosensors. Optical biosensors utilize techniques such as Raman spectroscopy, resonance light-scattering, fluorescence, and chemiluminescence, while electrochemical biosensors use cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and giant magnetic impedance. Future research will focus on developing AFP detection methods that are highly sensitive, stable, cost-effective, and easy to operate.
Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is widely-known as the most commonly used protein biomarker for liver cancer diagnosis at the early stage. Therefore, developing the highly sensitive and reliable method of AFP detection is of essential demand for practical applications. Herein, two types of aptamer-based AFP detection methods, i.e., optical and electrochemical biosensors, are reviewed in detail. The optical biosensors include Raman spectroscopy, dual-polarization interferometry, resonance light-scattering, fluorescence, and chemiluminescence. The electrochemical biosensors include cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and giant magnetic impedance. Looking into the future, methods for AFP detection that are high sensitivity, long-term stability, low cost, and operation convenience will continue to be developed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available