4.7 Article

Toxicological Aspects of Methotrexate Intoxication: Concentrations in Postmortem Biological Samples and Autopsy Findings

Journal

TOXICS
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxics10100572

Keywords

methotrexate; fatal intoxication; poisoning; distribution; LC-MS

Funding

  1. [SUBK.A120.22.047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to establish a method for determining methotrexate in postmortem samples and quantifying its distribution in a fatal intoxication case. The method was found to be simple, accurate, and selective, allowing for routine determination of methotrexate concentrations in postmortem specimens.
The aim of this study was the establishment of a UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS method to determine methotrexate in postmortem biological samples and quantify the postmortem distribution of methotrexate in a case of fatal intoxication of this drug. A volume of 100 mu L or 100 mg of postmortem specimens was precipitated with 400 mu L of cold methanol and then analyzed using UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS. The validation parameters of the method were as follows: limit of quantification: 0.1-1.0 ng/mL or ng/g, coefficient of determination: >0.998 (R-2), matrix effect, intra- and inter-day accuracies and precisions: not greater than 13.6%, 14.8% and 17.4%, respectively. The recoveries were: 89.0-113.6%. The postmortem distribution studies revealed methotrexate concentrations as follows: blood-7.2 ng/mL, vitreous humor-0.8 ng/mL, liver-43.7 ng/g, kidney-20.6 ng/g, bone marrow-29.9 ng/g, lumbar vertebra-20.0 ng/g. The highest concentrations of methotrexate after poisoning were found in the tissues with the most rapidly dividing cells. The method described is simple, precise and selective. Methotrexate concentrations can be routinely determined in postmortem specimens. Determination of methotrexate in the postmortem biological material is possible after a few days of intensive treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available