4.7 Article

Analytical Method Development and Dermal Absorption of Pyrogallol, a Hair Dye Ingredient

Journal

TOXICS
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxics10100570

Keywords

Franz diffusion cell; high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

Funding

  1. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Republic of Korea [19172MFDS221, 22202MFDS158]
  2. Korea Environment Industry and Technology Institute (KEITI) through the Technology Program for Establishing Biocide Safety Management - Korea Environment (MOE) [2021002970001, 1485017976]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed an analytical method and determined the dermal absorption rate of pyrogallol to be 26.0 +/- 3.9%.
Pyrogallol is an ingredient in hair dye. Its concentration in hair dye is managed at less than 2.0% in Korea. There have been no reports on the dermal absorption rate of pyrogallol. The two purposes of this study were to develop an analytical method and determine the dermal absorption rate of pyrogallol. An analytical method was developed and validated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of various matrices including swabs (SWAB), skin (SKIN, dermis + epidermis), stratum corneum (SC), and receptor fluid (RF). Linearity (r(2) = 0.9993-0.9998), accuracy (92.1-108.2%), and precision (0.5-9.5%) met the validation criteria in guidelines. A Franz diffusion cell was used to determine the dermal absorption of pyrogallol using the skin of mini pigs. Pyrogallol (2.0%) was applied to the skin (10 mu L/cm(2)). For the actual hair dye conditions, the skin was wiped with a swab 30 min after application. Twenty-four hours later, it was wiped with a swab again and the SC was collected using tape stripping. All samples were extracted with water and analyzed. RF was recovered at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h. The total dermal absorption rate of pyrogallol was determined to be 26.0 +/- 3.9%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available