4.6 Article

Standardised lesion segmentation for imaging biomarker quantitation: a consensus recommendation from ESR and EORTC

Journal

INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01287-4

Keywords

Segmentation and standardisation; mDelphi; Region of interest; Organ-specific; Modality-specific

Funding

  1. European Union [826494, 952159, 952172, 101057699]
  2. NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA008748]
  3. National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
  4. French government under management of the Agence Nationale de la Recherche as part of the Investissements d'avenir program [ANR19-P3IA-0001]
  5. Horizon Europe - Pillar II [101057699] Funding Source: Horizon Europe - Pillar II

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes standardized criteria for background lesion/tissue segmentation on digital medical images, which is crucial for biomarker extraction and developing artificial intelligence algorithms. The criteria were established through a modified Delphi process involving expert participants and cover various factors such as system performance certification, thresholds for image quality, and operator training and certification.
Background Lesion/tissue segmentation on digital medical images enables biomarker extraction, image-guided therapy delivery, treatment response measurement, and training/validation for developing artificial intelligence algorithms and workflows. To ensure data reproducibility, criteria for standardised segmentation are critical but currently unavailable. Methods A modified Delphi process initiated by the European Imaging Biomarker Alliance (EIBALL) of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Imaging Group was undertaken. Three multidisciplinary task forces addressed modality and image acquisition, segmentation methodology itself, and standards and logistics. Devised survey questions were fed via a facilitator to expert participants. The 58 respondents to Round 1 were invited to participate in Rounds 2-4. Subsequent rounds were informed by responses of previous rounds. Results/conclusions Items with >= 75% consensus are considered a recommendation. These include system performance certification, thresholds for image signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise and tumour-to-background ratios, spatial resolution, and artefact levels. Direct, iterative, and machine or deep learning reconstruction methods, use of a mixture of CE marked and verified research tools were agreed and use of specified reference standards and validation processes considered essential. Operator training and refreshment were considered mandatory for clinical trials and clinical research. Items with a 60-74% agreement require reporting (site-specific accreditation for clinical research, minimal pixel number within lesion segmented, use of post-reconstruction algorithms, operator training refreshment for clinical practice). Items with <= 60% agreement are outside current recommendations for segmentation (frequency of system performance tests, use of only CE-marked tools, board certification of operators, frequency of operator refresher training). Recommendations by anatomical area are also specified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available