4.6 Article

Stronger Together: Air-Ground Robotic Collaboration Using Semantics

Journal

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 9643-9650

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3191165

Keywords

Field Robots; multi-Robot systems; cooperating Robots

Categories

Funding

  1. ARL DCIST CRA [W911NF-17-2-0181]
  2. NSF [CCR-2112665, CNS-1446592, EEC-1941529]
  3. ONR [N00014-20-1-2822, N00014-20-S-B001]
  4. NVIDIA
  5. NASA Space Technology Research Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we propose an end-to-end heterogeneous multi-robot system framework that enables ground robots to localize, plan, and navigate in a real-time semantic map created by a high-altitude quadrotor. The ground robots autonomously choose and resolve targets, and perform cross-view localization with the overhead map. The entire system operates with an opportunistic and distributed communication backbone, requiring no external infrastructure aside from GPS for the quadrotor.
In this work, we present an end-to-end heterogeneous multi-robot system framework where ground robots are able to localize, plan, and navigate in a semantic map created in real time by a high-altitude quadrotor. The ground robots choose and deconflict their targets independently, without any external intervention. Moreover, they perform cross-view localization by matching their local maps with the overhead map using semantics. The communication backbone is opportunistic and distributed, allowing the entire system to operate with no external infrastructure aside from GPS for the quadrotor. We extensively tested our system by performing different missions on top of our framework over multiple experiments in different environments. Our ground robots travelled over 6 km autonomously with minimal intervention in the real world and over 96 km in simulation without interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available