4.7 Article

Investigating effects of group model building on sustainable design decision-making

Journal

SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION
Volume 33, Issue -, Pages 846-862

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.005

Keywords

Sustainable product development; Group model building; Decision -making effects; System analysis; Sustainable design support

Funding

  1. Knowledge Foundation [2199]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research investigates the effects of a Group Model Building approach on the sustainability knowledge base prior to the weighting of design requirements. The results show that the approach improves the understanding of sustainability among design teams and facilitates alignment on the importance of sustainability criteria. However, it does not significantly impact the knowledge maturity of design decisions.
This research seeks to investigate the effects of a Group Model Building approach on the sustainability knowledge base prior to the weighting of design requirements. Current practice shows that the knowledge about sustainabil-ity impacts and implications on other design objectives often is limited and dispersed among decision-makers. Including sustainability criteria in needs and requirements, therefore, tend to rely on limited knowledge and decision-support, leading to decision-makers often prioritizing design objectives that they are more experienced with. The aim of this research was to capture and discuss effects on team alignment of contextual sustainability understanding from co-modeling impacts and implications of sustainability on other design objectives. The re-search question guiding the study is 'what are the effects of a group model building approach on early sustainability design decisions?'. A mixed-methods research, structured according to four assumptions, was designed to analyze effects quantitatively and qualitatively. The assumptions were that the proposed approach helps design teams foster an improved contextual sustainability understanding, align the view of the relative importance of sustain -ability, identify suitable sustainability improvement, and increase the knowledge maturity of their design deci-sions. The results triangulation showed that the participants showed signs of improved sustainability understanding of their design projects and that improvement actions were identified from applying the ap-proach. A statistically relevant converging effect could be found on the team alignment of the weighting of sus-tainability criteria but not on the knowledge maturity. These findings are discussed to conclude on main contributions, limitations, and areas for future work.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Institution of Chemical Engineers. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available