Effects of Knee Extension Joint Angle on Quadriceps Femoris Muscle Activation and Exerted Torque in Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction

Simple Summary For human movement to occur, the neural system needs to activate muscles. Muscles then pull the bones that rotate around the joints. As the joint angle for the movement initiation changes, the mechanical conditions for the muscle force production also change, as does the exerted torque (i.e., maximal endpoint force). However, it is unclear whether different joint angles produce different muscle activation in maximal voluntary isometric contraction. This study investigated the effects of knee joint angle on muscle activation, produced torque, and whether the knee angle affects the muscle activation-torque ratio. Participants were instructed to produce maximal isometric knee extension in joint angles of 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, and 130 degrees, while their muscle activation and torque output were assessed. The results confirmed the dependence of torque on knee angle, while muscle activation remained unaffected. While the trend could be observed, significant effects did not occur in muscle activation-torque ratio for lateral and medial quadriceps heads. The investigated range of knee joint angles seems to provide optimal conditions for maximal muscle activation but not for the torque output, hence for the ligament loading and joint contact forces. Therefore, clinicians and sports coaches should carefully set the training goals and choose the knee joint angles accordingly. This study investigated the effects of knee joint angle on muscle activation, exerted torque, and whether the knee angle affects the muscle activation-torque ratio. Nine healthy adult male participants participated in the study. They performed maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) at six (80 degrees, 90 degrees, 100 degrees, 110 degrees, 120 degrees, and 130 degrees) different knee joint angles (i.e., angles between the thigh and shin bones). Their maximal torque was assessed utilizing an isokinetic chair, while their muscle activation (root mean square [RMS]) was assessed using an eight-channel single differential surface EMG sensor. For the purposes of the torque-knee angle relationship and muscle activation-knee angle relationship, the torque and RMS were normalized relative to the maximal value obtained by each participant. To evaluate the muscle activation-torque ratio in function of knee angle, RMS was normalized relative to the corresponding torque obtained at each knee angle. Repeated measure analysis of variance was used to investigate the effects of knee angle on muscle activation, torque, and muscle activation-torque ratio. There was a significant effect of knee joint angle on normalized torque (F = 27.521, p < 0.001), while the activation of vastus lateralis and vastus medialis remained unchanged. The changes in knee angle affected the muscle activation-torque ratio of vastus lateralis (Chi-square = 16.246, p = 0.006) but not the vastus medialis. These results suggest that knee joint angles from 80 degrees to 130 degrees provide a stable milieu for muscle electrification, while mechanical factor such as knee joint angle (i.e., lever arm length) affect the torque output when one needs to contract quadriceps maximally during the isometric contraction.

Automated summary

This study investigated the effects of knee joint angle on muscle activation, exerted torque, and whether the knee angle affects the muscle activation-torque ratio. The results showed that knee joint angle had an effect on torque, while muscle activation remained unaffected. Significant effects were not observed in the muscle activation-torque ratio for lateral and medial quadriceps heads. The investigated range of knee joint angles seems to provide optimal conditions for maximal muscle activation but not for torque output, ligament loading, and joint contact forces. Clinicians and sports coaches should carefully consider training goals and choose knee joint angles accordingly.