4.6 Review

Intracardiac echocardiography Chinese expert consensus

Journal

FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1012731

Keywords

intracardiac echocardiography; arrhythmia; transseptal puncture; congenital heart disease; structural heart disease; left atrial appendage closure; device implantation and lead extraction; cardiomyopathy and pulmonary arterial hypertension

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Percutaneous catheter interventions have become essential for diagnosing and treating structural heart diseases and arrhythmias. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is increasingly used in cardiac interventions due to its real-time imaging and monitoring capabilities. This consensus document provides guidance for clinicians and aims to improve interventional cardiovascular diagnosis and treatment procedures by standardizing the clinical applications of ICE.
In recent years, percutaneous catheter interventions have continuously evolved, becoming an essential strategy for interventional diagnosis and treatment of many structural heart diseases and arrhythmias. Along with the increasing complexity of cardiac interventions comes ever more complex demands for intraoperative imaging. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is well-suited for these requirements with real-time imaging, real-time monitoring for intraoperative complications, and a well-tolerated procedure. As a result, ICE is increasingly used many types of cardiac interventions. Given the lack of relevant guidelines at home and abroad and to promote and standardize the clinical applications of ICE, the members of this panel extensively evaluated relevant research findings, and they developed this consensus document after discussions and correlation with front-line clinical work experience, aiming to provide guidance for clinicians and to further improve interventional cardiovascular diagnosis and treatment procedures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available