4.6 Article

Efficacy and safety evaluation of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization

Journal

FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.978639

Keywords

oral anticoagulants; nonvalvular atrial fibrillation; peripheral arterial disease; lower extremity revascularization; revascularization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing lower-extremity revascularization. The results showed that there were no significant differences in efficacy and safety outcomes between the two drugs.
IntroductionThe efficacy and safety of antithrombotic strategies remain uncertain in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing lower-extremity revascularisation. Materials and methodsBetween January 2011 and November 2021, 319 patients with atrial fibrillation after lower-extremity revascularisation received rivaroxaban or warfarin treatment as anticoagulation regimens with different antiplatelet therapy strategies. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of acute limb ischaemia, major amputation for vascular causes, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, clinically driven target lesion revascularisation, and death from vascular causes. The safety outcomes were major bleeding events according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis classification criteria. ResultsA total of 178 and 141 patients received rivaroxaban and warfarin treatments, respectively, after revascularisation with or without antiplatelet regimens. The incidence of the primary efficacy outcome at 36 months in the rivaroxaban group (44 patients, 24.7%) tended to be lower than that in the warfarin group (43 patients, 30.5%) (hazard ratio, 0.870; 95% confidence interval, 0.565-1.339; P = 0.527). The incidence of the secondary efficacy outcomes decreased in the rivaroxaban group (56 patients, 31.6%) compared with that in the warfarin group (61 patients, 43.2%). Major bleeding events occurred in three patients (1.7%) in the rivaroxaban group and five patients (3.5%) in the warfarin group; no significant difference in fatal or intracranial bleeding was observed between the groups. ConclusionThis study describes practical experience regarding the use of rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients with peripheral arterial disease complicated by non-valvular atrial fibrillation following endovascular intervention. The efficacy and safety outcomes do not differ significantly between rivaroxaban and warfarin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available