4.6 Article

Surgical treatment strategies for patients with type A aortic dissection involving arch anomalies

Journal

FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.979431

Keywords

aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA); isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA); surgical procedures; arch anomalies; cannulation and perfusion; hybrid therapy; total arch replacement; bovine arch

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1002600]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2017A070701013, 2017B090904034, 2017B030314109, 2019B020230003]
  3. Guangdong Peak Project [DFJH201802]
  4. Guangzhou Science and Technology Program Key Projects [202002020037]
  5. Guangdong special funds for science and technology innovation strategy, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated surgical modalities and outcomes in patients with type A aortic dissection involving arch anomalies. By preserving and reconstructing the supra-arch vessels, patients achieved favorable perioperative outcomes. Patients with bovine anomalies had higher perioperative mortality rate and incidence of neurological complications. During the follow-up period, some patients required aortic re-intervention.
ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to investigate surgical modalities and outcomes in patients with type A aortic dissection involving arch anomalies. MethodPatients with type A aortic dissection who underwent surgical treatment at our center between January 2017 and 31 December 2020 were selected for this retrospective analysis. Data including computed tomography (CT), surgical records, and cardiopulmonary bypass records were analyzed. Perioperatively survived patients were followed up, and long-term mortality and aortic re-interventions were recorded. ResultA total of 81 patients with arch anomalies were included, 35 with bovine anomalies, 23 with an aberrant right subclavian artery, 22 with an isolated left vertebral artery, and one with a right-sided arch + aberrant left subclavian artery. The strategies of arch management and cannulation differed according to the anatomic variation of the aortic arch. In total, seven patients (9%) died after surgery. Patients with bovine anomalies had a higher perioperative mortality rate (14%) and incidence of neurological complications (16%). Overall, four patients died during the follow-up period, with a 6-year survival rate of 94.6% (70/74). A total of four patients underwent aortic re-intervention during the follow-up period; before the re-intervention, three received the en bloc technique (13.6% 3/22) and one received hybrid therapy (11.1% 1/9). ConclusionWith complete preservation and reconstruction of the supra-arch vessels, patients with type A aortic dissection combining arch anomalies can achieve a favorable perioperative prognostic outcome. Patients who received the en bloc technique are more likely to require aortic re-intervention than patients who underwent total arch replacement with a four-branched graft vessel. Cannulation strategies should be tailored according to the variation of anatomy, but routine cannulation with the right axillary artery can still be performed in most patients with arch anomalies, even for patients with an aberrant right subclavian artery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available