4.6 Review

Non-coding RNAs to regulate cardiomyocyte proliferation: A new trend in therapeutic cardiac regeneration

Journal

FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.944393

Keywords

cardiomyocyte; regeneration; ncRNA; miRNA; lncRNA; circRNA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiovascular diseases, particularly ischemic heart disease, remain the leading cause of death worldwide. Scientists have shown great interest in researching myocardial tissue rejuvenation following ischemia, with previous studies highlighting the crucial role of non-coding RNAs in this process. This review summarizes recent research on cardiomyocyte regenerative medicine, focusing on the biological functions and mechanisms of microRNAs, long non-coding RNAs, and circular RNAs in posttranscriptional regulation of cardiomyocytes.
Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of death worldwide, particularly ischemic heart disease (IHD). It is also classified as incurable given the irreversible damage it causes to cardiomyocytes. Thus, myocardial tissue rejuvenation following ischemia is one of the global primary research concerns for scientists. Interestingly, the mammalian heart thrives after an injury during the embryonic or neonatal period; however, this ability disappears with increasing age. Previous studies have found that specific non-coding (nc) RNAs play a pivotal role in this process. Hence, the review herein summarizes the research on cardiomyocyte regenerative medicine in recent years and sets forth the biological functions and mechanisms of the micro (mi)RNA, long non-coding (lnc)RNA, and circular (circ)RNA in the posttranscriptional regulation of cardiomyocytes. In addition, this review summarizes the roles of ncRNAs in specific species while enumerating potential therapeutic strategies for myocardial infarction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available