4.7 Article

MRI tractography reveals the human olfactory nerve map connecting the olfactory epithelium and olfactory bulb

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03794-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. KAKENHI grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [JP19K21357, JP20K18265, JP17K19735, 21K09568]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combined high-field MRI and DTI analyses allow visualization of olfactory sensory neurons and their projections, providing olfactory nerve maps in humans, marmosets, and mice. This technique has the potential to be used clinically for the diagnosis of olfactory dysfunction.
Combined high-field MRI and DTI analyses in post-mortem mouse, marmoset, and human samples provide insight into the neural connections between nasal cavities and olfactory bulbs. The olfactory nerve map describes the topographical neural connections between the olfactory epithelium in the nasal cavity and the olfactory bulb. Previous studies have constructed the olfactory nerve maps of rodents using histological analyses or transgenic animal models to investigate olfactory nerve pathways. However, the human olfactory nerve map remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that high-field magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor tractography can be used to visualize olfactory sensory neurons while maintaining their three-dimensional structures. This technique allowed us to evaluate the olfactory sensory neuron projections from the nasal cavities to the olfactory bulbs and visualize the olfactory nerve maps of humans, marmosets and mice. The olfactory nerve maps revealed that the dorsal-ventral and medial-lateral axes were preserved between the olfactory epithelium and olfactory bulb in all three species. Further development of this technique might allow it to be used clinically to facilitate the diagnosis of olfactory dysfunction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available