4.7 Article

Validation Study of the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire in Patients with Acute Stroke

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091473

Keywords

sleep; stroke; questionnaire; screening; Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire; polysomnography; stroke unit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sleep disorders are common in acute stroke patients. The Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) has been validated for use in patients with acute stroke and can be used to screen sleep quality and assess sleep efficiency in stroke patients.
Sleep disorders are frequent in acute stroke. The Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) is a validated scale for the sleep assessment in intensive care unit. The aim of the present study is to validate RCSQ for use in patients with acute stroke. We performed a validation study by comparing the RCSQ with polysomnography (PSG), the standardized measure of sleep. Inclusion criteria were age >= 18 years and a radiologically confirmed diagnosis of stroke. Exclusion criteria were global aphasia, extreme severity of clinical conditions and inability to attend PSG. All patients underwent PSG in a stroke unit, the day after a subjective sleep assessment by means of the RCSQ. The RCSQ was compared with PSG parameters to assess the degree of concordance of the two measures. The cohort consisted of 36 patients. Mean RCSQ score was 61.5 +/- 24.8. The total score of the RCSQ showed a good degree of concordance with the sleep efficiency index of PSG. Accuracy of the RCSQ was 70%, sensitivity 71% and specificity 68%. The RCSQ is a good tool for screening the sleep quality in the setting of a stroke unit. Therefore, it could be useful to select the patients who might beneficiate from an instrumental sleep evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available