4.7 Article

Polyvalent guide RNAs for CRISPR antivirals

Journal

ISCIENCE
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105333

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Sciences [1R35GM133483]
  2. University of North Carolina System's Strategic Research Funding for COVIDrelated grants
  3. North Carolina Biotechnology Center [NCBC] [2020-FLG-3821]
  4. University of North Carolina at Greensboro [133504]
  5. UNC Greensboro
  6. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1542174]
  7. Joint School of Nanoscience and Nanoengineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a strategy to design polyvalent gRNAs that can simultaneously target multiple viral sites with high activity, leading to superior antiviral elimination in higher organisms.
CRISPR effector Cas13 recognizes and degrades RNA molecules that are complementary to its guide RNA (gRNA) and possesses potential as an antiviral biotechnology because it can degrade viralmRNAandRNAgenomes. Because multiplexed targeting is a critical strategy to improve viral suppression, we developed a strategy to design of gRNAs where individual gRNAs have maximized activity at multiple viral targets, simultaneously, by exploiting the molecular biophysics of promiscuous target recognition by Cas13. These ``polyvalent'' gRNA sequences (``pgRNAs'') provide superior antiviral elimination across tissue/organ scales in a higher organism (Nicotiana benthamiana) compared to conventionally-designed gRNAs-reducing detectable viral RNA by >30-fold, despite lacking perfect complementarity with either of their targets and, when multiplexed, reducing viral RNA by >99.5%. Pairs of pgRNA-targetable sequences are abundant in the genomes of RNA viruses, and this work highlights the need for specific approaches to the challenges of targeting viruses in eukaryotes using CRISPR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available