4.7 Article

Human variation in population-wide gene expression data predicts gene perturbation phenotype

Journal

ISCIENCE
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105328

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC2151-390873048]
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SCHU 950/8-1, GRK 2168, TP11, SFB704]
  3. BMBF
  4. EU project SYSCID [733100]
  5. Department of Genomics & Immunoregulation at the LIMES Institute
  6. Spinoza grant of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
  7. ERC Advanced Grant [833247]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilizes population-scale datasets to infer gene function and relationships between phenotypes and expression, successfully stratifying genes according to biological functions and predicting the importance of monocytes in the pathophysiology of a specific disease.
Population-scale datasets of healthy individuals capture genetic and environmental factors influencing gene expression. The expression variance of a gene of interest (GOI) can be exploited to set up a quasi loss- or gain-of-function in population experiment. We describe here an approach, huva (human variation), taking advantage of population-scale multi-layered data to infer gene function and relationships between phenotypes and expression. Within a reference dataset, huva derives two experimental groups with LOW or HIGH expression of the GOI, enabling the subsequent comparison of their transcriptional profile and functional parameters. We demonstrate that this approach robustly identifies the phenotypic relevance of a GOI allowing the stratification of genes according to biological functions, and we generalize this concept to almost 16,000 genes in the human transcriptome. Additionally, we describe how huva predicts monocytes to be the major cell type in the pathophysiology of STAT1 mutations, evidence validated in a clinical cohort.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available