4.6 Article

A First Draft of the Core Fungal Microbiome of Schedonorus arundinaceus with and without Its Fungal Mutualist Epichloe coenophiala

Journal

JOURNAL OF FUNGI
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jof8101026

Keywords

Schedonorus arundinaceus; Epichloe coenophiala; microbiome; endophyte; phyllosphere; foliar fungi

Funding

  1. Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used next-generation sequencing to describe the foliar fungal communities of field-grown tall fescue and investigated the impact of Epichloe coenophiala on these communities. The results showed that fungal communities did not differ strongly between Epichloe treatments, but varied significantly between different years.
Tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus) is a cool-season grass which is commonly infected with the fungal endophyte Epichloe coenophiala. Although the relationship between tall fescue and E. coenophiala is well-studied, less is known about its broader fungal communities. We used next-generation sequencing of the ITS2 region to describe the complete foliar fungal microbiomes in a set of field-grown tall fescue plants over two years, and whether these fungal communities were affected by the presence of Epichloe. We used the Georgia 5 cultivar of tall fescue, grown in the field for six years prior to sampling. Plants were either uninfected with E. coenophiala, or they were infected with one of two E. coenophiala strains: The common toxic strain or the AR542 strain (sold commerically as MaxQ). We observed 3487 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) across all plants and identified 43 ASVs which may make up a potential core microbiome. Fungal communities did not differ strongly between Epichloe treatments, but did show a great deal of variation between the two years. Plant fitness also changed over time but was not influenced by E. coenophiala infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available