4.7 Article

Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Ameliorates Endothelial Activation and Thrombotic Diathesis Biomarkers in a Murine Model of Hind Limb Ischemia

Journal

BIOMEDICINES
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10092303

Keywords

granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; inflammation; endothelium; adhesion molecule; plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; limb ischemia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study suggests that GCSF administration in an atherosclerotic mouse model of hind limb ischemia can lead to decreases in biomarkers associated with endothelial activation and thrombosis.
Novel therapies in peripheral arterial disease, such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) administration, might result in anti-atherosclerotic effects. In this study, we used 10-week-old male ApoE(-/-) mice, which were fed an atherosclerosis-inducing diet for four weeks. At the end of the four weeks, hind limb ischemia was induced through left femoral artery ligation, the atherosclerosis-inducing diet was discontinued, and a normal diet was initiated. Mice were then randomized into a control group (intramuscular 0.4 mL normal saline 0.9% for 7 days) and a group in which GCSF was administrated intramuscularly in the left hind limb for 7 days (100 mg/kg). In the GCSF group, but not in the control group, we observed significant reductions in the soluble adhesion molecules (vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1)), sE-Selectin, and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 when they were measured through ELISA on the 1st and the 28th days after hind limb ischemia induction. Therefore, GCSF administration in an atherosclerotic mouse model of hind limb ischemia led to decreases in the biomarkers associated with endothelial activation and thrombosis. These findings warrant further validation in future preclinical studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available