4.6 Article

Assessment of the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence in the reimbursement decisions of new cancer drugs

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Oncology

An appraisal of FDA approvals for adult solid tumours in 2017-2021: has the eagle landed?

Nathan Cherny

Summary: This Perspective evaluates the FDA approvals of therapeutic agents for use in solid tumour oncology for the period 2017-2021 against the aspirations of the Cancer Moonshot. The results indicate a low level of clinical benefit for a substantial proportion of the new indications, highlighting the need for improvement in the quality of approved treatments.

NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2022)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Evaluation of the Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Submitted for Reimbursement Recommendation Decisions in Canada

Daniel E. Meyers et al.

Summary: This cohort study evaluates the quality of evidence in the drug submission process for provincial reimbursement of the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review. The study found that only half of the cancer drugs recommended for reimbursement in Canada showed improved survival outcomes, despite consideration of the clinical benefit magnitude.

JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE (2021)

Article Genetics & Heredity

Using four decades of FDA orphan drug designations to describe trends in rare disease drug development: substantial growth seen in development of drugs for rare oncologic, neurologic, and pediatric-onset diseases

Kathleen L. Miller et al.

Summary: The analysis of orphan drug designations over the past four decades reveals significant shifts in the rare disease drug development space. The number of designations granted more than quadrupled between the 1990s and 2010s, with considerable changes in relative proportions over time within all therapeutic areas and disease categories. There have been notable increases in the proportion of drugs designated for oncology, pediatric-onset diseases, and neurologic disorders in the most recent decade.

ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES (2021)

Article Oncology

Twelve years of European cancer drug approval-a systematic investigation of the 'magnitude of clinical benefit'

N. Groessmann et al.

Summary: The study compared two versions of the ESMO-MCBS on European cancer drug approvals over the past 12 years and found that only a minority of cancer indications met the criteria for meaningful clinical benefit. There was an increase in approved cancer indications, but almost no difference was detected when comparing two predefined approval timeframes.

ESMO OPEN (2021)

Article Oncology

The cost of cancer in Europe 2018

Thomas Hofmarcher et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER (2020)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Limitations in Clinical Trials Leading to Anticancer Drug Approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration

Talal Hilal et al.

JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE (2020)

Article Genetics & Heredity

Factors associated with positive and negative recommendations for cancer and non-cancer drugs for rare diseases in Canada

Fernanda Naomi Inagaki Nagase et al.

ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES (2019)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Is it all about price? Why requests for government subsidy of anticancer drugs were rejected in Australia

Deme J. Karikios et al.

INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL (2017)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Methodological challenges for the evaluation of clinical effectiveness in the context of accelerated regulatory approval: an overview

Nerys Woolacott et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)

Article Oncology

The high price of anticancer drugs: origins, implications, barriers, solutions

Vinay Prasad et al.

NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2017)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Do cancer drugs improve survival or quality of life? You don't need to know, according to our broken regulatory system

Vinay Prasad

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Do cancer drugs improve survival or quality of life? You don't need to know, according to our broken regulatory system

Vinay Prasad

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Drugs, cancer and end-of-life care: A case study of pharmaceuticalization?

Courtney Davis

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE (2015)

Article Economics

THE INFLUENCE OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND OTHER FACTORS ON NICE DECISIONS

Helen Dakin et al.

HEALTH ECONOMICS (2015)

Article Economics

Pricing in the Market for Anticancer Drugs

David H. Howard et al.

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES (2015)

Article Oncology

Economic burden of cancer across the European Union: a population-based cost analysis

Ramon Luengo-Fernandez et al.

LANCET ONCOLOGY (2013)

Article Oncology

Delivering affordable cancer care in high-income countries

Richard Sullivan et al.

LANCET ONCOLOGY (2011)

Article Oncology

Development and economic trends in cancer therapeutic drugs in the UK from 1955 to 2009

Philip Savage

JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE (2010)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer

Kathy Miller et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2007)

Article Oncology

Progression-free survival is a surrogate for survival in advanced colorectal cancer

Marc Buyse et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2007)