Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Solar, wind and logistic substitution in global energy supply to 2050-Barriers and implications
R. J. Lowe et al.
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS (2022)
Impact of declining renewable energy costs on electrification in low-emission scenarios
Gunnar Luderer et al.
NATURE ENERGY (2022)
Sources of uncertainty in long-term global scenarios of solar photovoltaic technology
Marc Jaxa-Rozen et al.
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE (2021)
Modeling myths: On DICE and dynamic realism in integrated assessment models of climate change mitigation
Michael Grubb et al.
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE (2021)
Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power worldwide
Dan Tong et al.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2021)
The cost of mitigation revisited
Alexandre C. Koberle et al.
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE (2021)
Plummeting costs of renewables-Are energy scenarios lagging?
Mengzhu Xiao et al.
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS (2021)
Solar photovoltaics is ready to power a sustainable future
Marta Victoria et al.
JOULE (2021)
Low-cost renewable electricity as the key driver of the global energy transition towards sustainability
Dmitrii Bogdanov et al.
ENERGY (2021)
The social cost of carbon dioxide under climate-economy feedbacks and temperature variability
Jarmo S. Kikstra et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2021)
Comparing expert elicitation and model-based probabilistic technology cost forecasts for the energy transition
Jing Meng et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2021)
Keep climate policy focused on the social cost of carbon
Joseph E. Aldy et al.
SCIENCE (2021)
Re-examining rates of lithium-ion battery technology improvement and cost decline†
Micah S. Ziegler et al.
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE (2021)
Modelling net-zero emissions energy systems requires a change in approach
S. Pye et al.
CLIMATE POLICY (2021)
Energy modellers should explore extremes more systematically in scenarios
David L. McCollum et al.
NATURE ENERGY (2020)
Back to the basic: toward improvement of technoeconomic representation in integrated assessment models
Hiroto Shiraki et al.
CLIMATIC CHANGE (2020)
Granular technologies to accelerate decarbonization Smaller, modular energy technologies have advantages
C. Wilson et al.
SCIENCE (2020)
Rapid cost decrease of renewables and storage accelerates the decarbonization of China's power system
Gang He et al.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2020)
Early decarbonisation of the European energy system pays off
Marta Victoria et al.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2020)
A Review of Criticisms of Integrated Assessment Models and Proposed Approaches to Address These, through the Lens of BECCS
Ajay Gambhir et al.
ENERGIES (2019)
Is the renewables transformation a piece of cake or a pie in the sky?
Caroline Zimm et al.
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS (2019)
Looking under the hood: A comparison of techno-economic assumptions across national and global integrated assessment models
Volker Krey et al.
ENERGY (2019)
Recalibrating climate prospects
Amory B. Lovins et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2019)
The social cost of carbon revisited
Robert S. Pindyck
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (2019)
Wright meets Markowitz: How standard portfolio theory changes when assets are technologies following experience curves
Rupert Way et al.
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL (2019)
Synergies of sector coupling and transmission reinforcement in a cost-optimised, highly renewable European energy system
T. Brown et al.
ENERGY (2018)
Net-zero emissions energy systems
Steven J. Davis et al.
SCIENCE (2018)
Macroeconomic impact of stranded fossil fuel assets
J. -F. Mercure et al.
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE (2018)
A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies
Arnulf Grubler et al.
NATURE ENERGY (2018)
Future Prospects for Energy Technologies: Insights from Expert Elicitations
Elena Verdolini et al.
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY (2018)
How well do experience curves predict technological progress? A method for making distributional forecasts
Francois Lafond et al.
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE (2018)
The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century
Oliver Fricko et al.
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS (2017)
Revisiting the social cost of carbon
William D. Nordhaus
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2017)
The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change
Felix Creutzig et al.
NATURE ENERGY (2017)
Creating Agent-Based Energy Transition Management Models That Can Uncover Profitable Pathways to Climate Change Mitigation
Auke Hoekstra et al.
COMPLEXITY (2017)
Power capacity expansion planning considering endogenous technology cost learning
Clara F. Heuberger et al.
APPLIED ENERGY (2017)
Formalizing best practice for energy system optimization modelling
Joseph DeCarolis et al.
APPLIED ENERGY (2017)
Does cost optimization approximate the real-world energy transition?
Evelina Trutnevyte
ENERGY (2016)
Current climate models are grossly misleading
Nicholas Stern
NATURE (2016)
Learning through a portfolio of carbon capture and storage demonstration projects
David M. Reiner
NATURE ENERGY (2016)
How predictable is technological progress?
J. Doyne Farmer et al.
RESEARCH POLICY (2016)
The cost of CO2 capture and storage
Edward S. Rubin et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL (2015)
Locked into Copenhagen pledges - Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals
Keywan Riahi et al.
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE (2015)
Bending the learning curve
Jan Witajewski-Baltvilks et al.
ENERGY ECONOMICS (2015)
A Third Wave in the Economics of Climate Change
J. Doyne Farmer et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2015)
Global energy-climate scenarios and models: a review
Volker Krey
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT (2014)
Future capacity growth of energy technologies: are scenarios consistent with historical evidence?
C. Wilson et al.
CLIMATIC CHANGE (2013)
Decarbonising road transport with hydrogen and electricity: Long term global technology learning scenarios
Gabrial Anandarajah et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY (2013)
Statistical Basis for Predicting Technological Progress
Bela Nagy et al.
PLOS ONE (2013)
Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us?
Robert S. Pindyck
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE (2013)
The Relationship between Unit Cost and Cumulative Quantity and the Evidence for Organizational Learning-by-Doing
Peter Thompson
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES (2012)
Historical costs of coal-fired electricity and implications for the future
James McNerney et al.
ENERGY POLICY (2011)
Role of design complexity in technology improvement
James McNerney et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2011)
A long-term view of worldwide fossil fuel prices
Shahriar Shafiee et al.
APPLIED ENERGY (2010)
The best way forward
Charles D. Ferguson et al.
NATURE (2010)
The ethics of climate change
John Broome
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN (2008)
Forecasting technology costs via the experience curve - Myth or magic?
Stephan Alberth
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE (2008)
A functional approach for studying technological progress: Extension to energy technology
Heebyung Koh et al.
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE (2008)
A functional approach for studying technological progress: Application to information technology
Heebyung Koh et al.
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE (2006)
Modeling uncertainty of induced technological change
A Gritsevskyi et al.
ENERGY POLICY (2000)
Share Paper
