4.8 Article

Empirically grounded technology forecasts and the energy transition

Journal

JOULE
Volume 6, Issue 9, Pages 2057-2082

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.08.009

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Partners for a New Economy
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [730427]
  3. Oxford Martin School, through the Institute of New Economic Thinking
  4. Baillie Gifford
  5. Post -Carbon Transition programme [LDR00530]
  6. Economics of Energy Innovation and System Transition project (EEIST)
  7. UK Aid by the UK Government Department for Business, Energy, and Industrial Strategy (BEIS)
  8. Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rapidly decarbonizing the global energy system is crucial for addressing climate change. This study presents probabilistic cost forecasts for solar energy, wind energy, batteries, and electrolyzers, which indicate that a swift transition to green energy can result in substantial savings.
Rapidly decarbonizing the global energy system is critical for address-ing climate change, but concerns about costs have been a barrier to im-plementation. Most energy-economy models have historically underes-timated deployment rates for renewable energy technologies and overestimated their costs. These issues have driven calls for alternative approaches and more reliable technology forecasting methods. Here, we use an approach based on probabilistic cost forecasting methods that have been statistically validated by backtesting on more than 50 technologies. We generate probabilistic cost forecasts for solar energy, wind energy, batteries, and electrolyzers, conditional on deployment. We use these methods to estimate future energy system costs and explore how technology cost uncertainty propagates through to sys-tem costs in three different scenarios. Compared to continuing with a fossil fuel-based system, a rapid green energy transition will likely result in overall net savings of many trillions of dollars-even without account-ing for climate damages or co-benefits of climate policy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available