4.8 Article

High-performance cooling and heat pumping based on fatigue-resistant elastocaloric effect in compression

Journal

JOULE
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages 2338-2357

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.08.011

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the Horizon 2020 program [803669]
  2. Slovenian Research Agency [P2-0422]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [803669] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers have developed a new design for an elastocaloric regenerator that can operate in both cooling and heat-pumping modes with durable operation and high performance. This design achieves a maximum temperature span of 31.3 K in the heat-pumping mode or a maximum heating/cooling power of more than 60 W/KG at a temperature span of 10 K.
In recent years, elastocaloric cooling has shown great potential as an alternative to vapor-compression refrigeration. However, there is still no existing elastocaloric device that offers fatigue-resistant operation and yet high cooling/heat-pumping performance. Here, we introduce a new design of an elastocaloric regenerator based on compression-loaded Ni-Ti tubes, referred to as a shell-and tube-like elastocaloric regenerator. Our regenerator design, which can operate in both cooling and heat-pumping modes, enables durable operation and record performance with a maximum temperature span of 31.3 K in heat-pumping mode or maximum heating/cooling powers of more than 60 W, equivalent to 4,400 W/kg of the elastocaloric material (at temperature span of 10 K). In terms of both maximum performance metrics, these results surpass all previously developed caloric (magnetocaloric, electrocaloric, and elastocaloric) devices and demonstrate the enormous potential of compression-loaded elastocaloric regenerators to be used in elastocaloric devices for a wide range of cooling and heat-pumping applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available