4.7 Article

Machine Learning-Based Estimation of the Compressive Strength of Self-Compacting Concrete: A Multi-Dataset Study

Journal

MATHEMATICS
Volume 10, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math10203771

Keywords

self-compacting concrete; compressive strength; deep neural network; gradient boosting machine; machine learning

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper conducts a comparative study on the predictive capability of machine learning models for estimating the compressive strength of self-compacting concrete. The results indicate that deep neural network regression (DNNR) is the best model, followed by extreme gradient boosting machine (XGBoost). These models show great potential in modeling the compressive strength of self-compacting concrete.
This paper aims at performing a comparative study to investigate the predictive capability of machine learning (ML) models used for estimating the compressive strength of self-compacting concrete (SCC). Seven prominent ML models, including deep neural network regression (DNNR), extreme gradient boosting machine (XGBoost), gradient boosting machine (GBM), adaptive boosting machine (AdaBoost), support vector regression (SVR), Levenberg-Marquardt artificial neural network (LM-ANN), and genetic programming (GP), are employed. Four experimental datasets, compiled in previous studies, are used to construct the ML-based methods. The models' generalization capabilities are reliably evaluated by 20 independent runs. Experimental results point out the superiority of the DNNR, which has excelled other models in three out of four datasets. The XGBoost is the second-best model, which has gained the first rank in one dataset. The outcomes point out the great potential of the utilized ML approaches in modeling the compressive strength of SCC. In more details, the coefficient of determination (R-2) surpasses 0.8 and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) is always below 15% for all datasets. The best results of R-2 and MAPE are 0.93 and 7.2%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available