4.4 Article

Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE
Volume 86, Issue -, Pages 157-171

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.007

Keywords

Lexical prediction; Word form; Semantic processing; ERPs; SOA

Funding

  1. PPLS School Research Support Grants award
  2. School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences from University of Edinburgh
  3. Future Research Leaders Grant from the Economic and Social Research Council of the United Kingdom [ES/K009095/1]
  4. ESRC [ES/K009095/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/K009095/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We used ERPs to investigate the pre-activation of form and meaning in language comprehension. Participants read high-doze sentence contexts (e.g., The student is going to the library to borrow a...), followed by a word that was predictable (book), form-related (hook) or semantically related (page) to the predictable word, or unrelated (sofa). At a 500 ms SOA (Experiment 1), semantically related words, but not form-related words, elicited a reduced N400 compared to unrelated words. At a 700 ms SOA (Experiment 2), semantically related words and form-related words elicited reduced N400 effects, but the effect for form-related words occurred in very high-doze sentences only. At both SOAs, form-related words elicited an enhanced, post-N400 posterior positivity (Late Positive Component effect). The 11400 effects suggest that readers can pre-activate meaning and form information for highly predictable words, but form pre-activation is more limited than meaning pre-activation. The post-N400 LPC effect suggests that participants detected the form similarity between expected and encountered input. Pre-activation of word forms crucially depends upon the time that readers have to make predictions, in line with production-based accounts of linguistic prediction. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available