4.4 Article

Gut bacterial diversity on the basis of feeding behaviour in different species of thrips (Thysanoptera)

Journal

JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY FOR SCIENCE
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 863-873

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/16583655.2022.2123208

Keywords

Gut bacteria; 16s rRNA amplicon sequencing; thrips; feeding habitat

Funding

  1. ZSI Core funding, Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change, New Delhi, Republic of India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study comprehensively characterized the gut bacteria of nine thrips species collected from two geographical areas of India and attempted to elucidate the impact of different feeding habits on the gut microbiota. The results showed that the gut bacterial structure at the phylum level was similar among different thrips species, but significantly different at the genus level. The gut microbiota was involved in various metabolic pathways.
Thrips, tiny to medium sized insects with fringed wings are economically important due to their pestiferous and predatory behaviour. They have a wide range of feeding habitats i.e. leaf feeders, to flower, spore, and fungus feeders. Here, we comprehensively characterized the gut bacteria of nine thrips species collected from two geographical areas of India. Moreover, an attempt to elucidate the impact of different feeding habits (leaf, flower, and spore) on the gut microbiota was also carried out. Comparative analyses revealed that the gut bacterial structure at the phylum level was almost similar with dominant phyla such as Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes with few exceptions. Further, at genera level, the gut bacteria were significantly different and revealed the presence of the highest abundance of Rosenbergiella, Wolbachia, Curtobacterium Acinetobacter, and Pseudomonas. Moreover, the gut microbiota was involved in pathways such as Biosynthesis of amino acids, vitamin metabolism etc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available