4.4 Article

Novel thiadiazole-thiazole hybrids: synthesis, molecular docking, and cytotoxicity evaluation against liver cancer cell lines

Journal

JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY FOR SCIENCE
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 1005-1015

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/16583655.2022.2135805

Keywords

1,3-thiazoles; 1,3,4-thiadiazoles; hydrazonoyl halides; cytotoxicity evaluation; molecular docking

Funding

  1. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [PNURSP2022R24]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer, one of the deadliest diseases, claims millions of lives annually, prompting the need for novel treatments. In this study, a series of novel thiadiazoles were designed and evaluated for their growth-inhibitory potential against liver cancer cells. Promising anticancer activity was observed in two compounds.
One of the worst diseases, cancer claims millions of lives each year throughout the world, necessitating the creation of novel treatments. In this study, we designed a novel series of 1,3,4-thiadiazoles through the reaction of 2-(4-methyl-2-(2-(1-phenylethylidene)hydrazineyl)thiazole-5-carbonyl)-N-phenylhydrazine-1-carbothioamide (3) with the proper hydrazonoyl halides. Using the MTT assay, the newly synthesized thiadiazoles' growth-inhibitory potential against the liver cancer cell line HepG2-1 was assessed. In comparison to the standard drug doxorubicin (IC50 = 0.72 +/- 0.52 mu M), the results showed that two compounds, 16b and 21 (IC50 = 0.69 +/- 0.41 and 1.82 +/- 0.94 mu M, respectively) had promising anticancer activity. The structural activity relationship (SAR) was investigated. In addition, molecular docking analysis onto quinone oxidoreductase2 (NQO2) receptor (PDB: 4ZVM) was investigated against the potent compounds to examine the reliability of the in vitro results. The newly prepared thiadiazole-thiazole hybrids are therefore regarded as potent anticancer drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available