4.6 Review

SiC detectors: A review on the use of silicon carbide as radiation detection material

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2022.898833

Keywords

wide-bandgap semiconductors; silicon carbide (SiC); semiconductor radiation detectors; SiC detector fabrication; SiC detector characterization methods; defects in silicon carbide; radiation detection and measurement; radiation damage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Silicon Carbide (SiC) is a wide bandgap semiconductor with excellent properties, making it a promising material for radiation particle detection. This review provides an overview of the advantages and current research in SiC detectors. Key aspects related to material properties, growth techniques, doping, defects, electrical contacts, and characterization methods are summarized, with emphasis on their relationship to detector performance. The most recent experimental results on the use of SiC diodes for detecting various particles and radiation are discussed, as well as the effects of high temperature operation and radiation damage on detector performance.
Silicon Carbide (SiC) is a wide bandgap semiconductor with many excellent properties that make it one of the most promising and well-studied materials for radiation particle detection. This review provides an overview of the main advantages in the use of SiC detectors and the current state of research in this field. Key aspects related to material properties, growth techniques, doping, defects, electrical contacts, and characterization methods are summarized, with particular emphasis on how these can be related to detector performance. The most recent and significant experimental results on the use of SiC diodes for the detection of electrons, protons, alpha, ions, UV radiation, x/gamma-rays, and neutrons are discussed. The effects of high temperature operation and radiation damage on detector performance are outlined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available