4.7 Article

Assessing the impact of governance and health expenditures on carbon emissions in China: Role of environmental regulation

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.949729

Keywords

health expenditures; governance; income; rule of law; China

Funding

  1. National Social Science Foundation
  2. Inner Mongolia Social Sciences Foundation
  3. [19XMZ102]
  4. [2021YB07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the relationship between the environment and development in China's economy and reveals important findings such as an inverted U-shaped relationship, a positive association between urbanization and environmental deterioration, and a negative association between good governance and carbon emissions. The results highlight the need for revised environmental regulation policies.
The current study tries to summarize the leading factors and their behavior toward the environmental quality. Therefore, this study investigates the environment-development linkage in China's economy covering the period of 1984-2018. In order to investigate the proposed objectives, the current study uses the dynamic ordinary least square, fully modified ordinary least square and canonical co-integration regression with granger causality test. The results reveal that there exists an inverted U-shaped relationship in China's economy. Likewise, urbanization positively contributes to environmental deterioration. Furthermore, the health expenditures also cause to deteriorate the environmental quality. In contrast, there exists the negative association between good governance and carbon emissions, while the rule of law in China's economy does not secure the environmental quality. Therefore, environmental regulation policies need to be revised in order to achieve a sustainable environment. As a result, we recommend that China continue to expand its economy and invest in health care and environmental initiatives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available