4.5 Article

Hypebaeus cooteri sp. nov., the Nemoral Species of Soft-Winged Flower Beetles (Coleoptera, Malachiidae) in North Asia

Journal

DIVERSITY-BASEL
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/d14100875

Keywords

Hypebaeus; areal disjunction; new species; North Asia; Southern Primorie; taxonomy

Funding

  1. Program of Basic Scientific Research (FNI) of the State Academies of Sciences [122011800267-4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new species of soft-winged flower beetle, similar in appearance to a known species but differing in certain characteristics, was described from the Russian Far East. The disjunctive distribution of the new species from the main distribution area of the genus was discussed in relation to forest distribution during specific time periods. Oak trees were identified as the typical habitat for the genus Hypebaeus based on field studies in the UK. The nominative species of the genus, H. flavipes, was redescribed from specimens collected in Great Britain.
A new species of soft-winged flower beetle, Hypebaeus cooteri Tshernyshev, sp. nov., external appearance very close to H. flavipes (Fabricius, 1787) but differs in shape of the elytral appendages and dark colouration of apical margin of the elytra is described from the Russian Far East. Phenomenon of disjunctive distribution of the new species from the main areal of the genus is discussed on the basis of nemoral faunogenesis during the Late Pleistocene and the Middle Holocene in dependence of broad-leaf forest distribution. Oak trees are considered as typical habitat of the genus Hypebaeus Kiesenwetter, 1863 on the basis of field study by Jonathan Cooter in Moccas Park National Nature Reserve on old oak trees in UK. H. flavipes, the nominative species of the genus Hypebaeus, is redescribed from the specimens collected in Great Britain. Illustrations of external appearance and special male characters for both species are provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available