Journal
RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages 1741-1749Publisher
DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S380691
Keywords
ischemic stroke; COVID-19 pandemic; thrombolysis; thrombectomy; hospitalization cost
Funding
- Foshan Medical Technology Innovation Platform Construction Foundation [FS0AA-KJ218 -1301-0012]
- Foshan Competitive Support Talent Foundation, China
- Foshan Key Discipline Foundation, China
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study investigated the impact and outcomes of characteristic ischemic stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. The results showed that patients during the lockdown period had longer door-to-CT time and higher hospitalization costs compared to the pre-lockdown period, but there were no significant differences in 3-month outcomes. Therefore, multidisciplinary collaboration and continuous workflow optimization are necessary to maintain stroke care during the COVID-19 lockdown.
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the impact of characteristic ischemic stroke and outcomes during the first COVID-19 pandemic lockdown.Patients and Methods: A retrospective, observational cohort study of a comprehensive tertiary stroke center was conducted. Patients with ischemic stroke were divided into pre-COVID-19 lockdown (11/1/2019 to 1/30/2020) and COVID-19 lockdown (1/31/2020 to 4/30/2020) period groups. Patient data on stroke admission, thrombolysis, endovascular treatment, and 3-month routine follow-up were recorded. Data analysis was performed using SPSS according to values following a Gaussian distribution.Results: The pre-COVID-19 lockdown period group comprised 230 patients compared to 215 patients in the COVID-19 lockdown period group. Atrial fibrillation was more predominant in the COVID-19 lockdown period group (11.68% vs 5.65%, p=0.02) alongside patients who were currently smoking (38.8% vs 28.7%, p=0.02) and drinking alcohol (30.37% vs 20.00%, p=0.012) compared with that of the pre-COVID-19 lockdown period group. For patients receiving thrombolysis, the median door-to-CT time was longer in the COVID-19 lockdown period group (17.0 min (13.0, 24.0) vs 12.0 min (8.0, 17.3), p=0.012), median door to needle time was 48.0 minutes (35.5, 73.0) vs 43.5 minutes (38.0, 53.3), p=0.50, compared with that of the pre-COVID-19 lockdown period group. There were no differences for patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy. The median length of hospitalization (IQR) was no different. Discharge mRS scores (IQR) were higher in the COVID-19 lockdown period group (1.0 (1.0, 3.0) vs 1.0 (1.0, 2.0), p=0.022). Compared with the pre-COVID-19 lockdown period, hospitalization cost (Chinese Yuan) in the COVID-19 period group was higher (13,445.7 (11,009.7, 20,030.5) vs 10,799.2 (8692.4, 16,381.7), p=0.000). There was no difference observed in 3-month mRS scores.Conclusion: Patients presenting with ischemic stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown period had longer median door-to -CT time and higher hospitalization costs. There were no significant differences in 3-month outcomes. Multidisciplinary collaboration and continuous workflow optimization may maintain stroke care during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available