4.7 Article

Characterization and comparison of the grindability, residual compressive strength, and hydrated phases of traditional cement prepared from lime rock and carbide slag

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105159

Keywords

Carbide slag; Traditional cement; Preparation temperature; Residual compressive strength; Hydrated phases

Funding

  1. Qingdao West Coast New Area 2020 Annual, Science and Technology Project [2020-2-3]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [51674161]
  3. Major Program of Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation [ZR2017ZC0735]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the increasing consumption of traditional cement, the demand for lime rock has also surged. This study compared the preparation of traditional cement using carbide slag (CS) and lime rock (LR), and found that CS can be a feasible substitute for LR in the production of traditional cement. This research provides a new resource management method for CS.
Multiplying consumption of traditional cement leads to a consequent surge in demand for lime rock (LR). Carbide slag (CS), a calcium solid waste , is forced to be produced during the pro-duction of acetylene. This work prepared a traditional cement (lime modulus: 0.95, silica modulus: 2.66, and alumina modulus: 1.51) from CS (S-CS) and compared it with that from LR (S-LR) by studying the preparation temperature, mineral phase, residual compressive strength, and hydrated phases and their structure and quantity, as well as analyzing the grindability of CS and LR. Results show that the grinding time for D90 (<= 80 mu m) of CS is 2 min (saving 76.22% energy compared to LR); 82.30 wt% CS substitutes for 86.39 wt% LR for the preparation of traditional cement without regard to the grinding and transportation, resulting in 0 wt% CO2 emission and the preparation temperature would be reduced by 50 C (saving 3.47% energy). The mineral phases of S-CS and S-LR are the same in types, but CS for the preparation of traditional cement is beneficial to the formation of Ca3SiO5 and Ca3Al2O6, except for Ca2SiO4. Results also show that the hydrated phases of S-CS and S-LR are the block CSH, rod AFt, and layer Ca(OH)2; while their quantity in S-CS is higher than that in S-LR, leading that S-CS performs better on the residual compressive strength after 30 times of sulfate resistance dry-wet cycle testing. This work provides a feasible substitute for LR and broadens a resource management method for CS in practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available