4.6 Article

Image Embeddings Extracted from CNNs Outperform Other Transfer Learning Approaches in Classification of Chest Radiographs

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092084

Keywords

medical imaging; X-rays; artificial intelligence; transfer learning; explainability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilized pretrained convolutional neural networks to identify abnormalities on chest radiographs, and evaluated their performance using an explainable AI model. The results showed that the best transfer learning model used image embeddings and random forest with simple averaging.
To identify the best transfer learning approach for the identification of the most frequent abnormalities on chest radiographs (CXRs), we used embeddings extracted from pretrained convolutional neural networks (CNNs). An explainable AI (XAI) model was applied to interpret black-box model predictions and assess its performance. Seven CNNs were trained on CheXpert. Three transfer learning approaches were thereafter applied to a local dataset. The classification results were ensembled using simple and entropy-weighted averaging. We applied Grad-CAM (an XAI model) to produce a saliency map. Grad-CAM maps were compared to manually extracted regions of interest, and the training time was recorded. The best transfer learning model was that which used image embeddings and random forest with simple averaging, with an average AUC of 0.856. Grad-CAM maps showed that the models focused on specific features of each CXR. CNNs pretrained on a large public dataset of medical images can be exploited as feature extractors for tasks of interest. The extracted image embeddings contain relevant information that can be used to train an additional classifier with satisfactory performance on an independent dataset, demonstrating it to be the optimal transfer learning strategy and overcoming the need for large private datasets, extensive computational resources, and long training times.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available