4.6 Review

The Urinary Microbiome: Role in Bladder Cancer and Treatment

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092068

Keywords

urinary microbiome; bladder cancer; Bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy; commensal microbes; tumor microenvironment; cytokines; urinary dysbiosis

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF2020R1C1C1003257]
  2. Korea University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dysbiosis of the urinary microbiome can contribute to the development of bladder cancer by creating a chronically inflammatory urothelial microenvironment. Modulating the urinary microbiome can alter the host immune system and cytokine responses, potentially providing a therapeutic approach for bladder cancer.
Commensal microbes have increasingly been found to be involved in the development and progression of cancer. The recent discovery of the urinary microbiome bolstered the notion that microbes might play a role in bladder cancer. Although microbial involvement in bladder neoplastic transformation and metastatic progression, except schisto somiasis, has not been established, accumulating research suggests that dysbiosis of the urinary microbiome can produce a chronically inflammatory urothelial microenvironment and lead to bladder cancer. In this review, we describe how the urinary microbiome might facilitate the development of bladder cancer by altering the host immune system and the kind of cytokines that are directly involved in these responses. We investigated the therapeutic possibilities of modulating the urinary microbiome, including immune checkpoint therapy. The responsiveness of patients to intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy was evaluated with respect to microbiome composition. We conclude by noting that the application of microbes to orchestrate the inflammatory response in the bladder may facilitate the development of treatments for bladder cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available