4.6 Article

Syndecan-1 as a severity biomarker for patients with trauma

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.985955

Keywords

trauma; syndecan-1; injury severity score; glycocalyx; probability of survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the utility of serum SDC-1 in evaluating trauma severity in patients. The results showed a significant association between serum SDC-1 level and injury severity score and probability of survival. Serum SDC-1 may serve as a useful biomarker for monitoring trauma severity.
Tissue injury and hemorrhage induced by trauma lead to degradation of the endothelial glycocalyx, causing syndecan-1 (SDC-1) to be shed into the blood. In this study, we investigated whether serum SDC-1 is useful for evaluating trauma severity in patients. A single-center, retrospective, observational study was conducted at Gifu University Hospital. Patients transported to the emergency room for trauma and subsequently admitted to the intensive care unit from January 2019 to December 2021 were enrolled. A linear regression model was constructed to evaluate the association of serum SDC-1 with injury severity score (ISS) and probability of survival (Ps). A total of 76 trauma patients (54 men and 22 women) were analyzed. ISS was significantly associated with serum SDC-1 level in trauma patients. Among the six body regions defined in the AIS used to calculate the ISS score, chest and abdominal or pelvic contents were significantly associated with serum SDC-1 level, and extremities or pelvic girdle also tended to show an association with serum SDC-1 level. Moreover, increasing serum SDC-1 level was significantly correlated with decreasing Ps. Serum SDC-1 may be a useful biomarker for monitoring the severity of trauma in patients. Further large-scale studies are warranted to verify these results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available