4.7 Article

Structure-Activity Relationship Studies for Enhancer of Zeste Homologue 2 (EZH2) and Enhancer of Zeste Homologue 1 (EZH1) Inhibitors

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 59, Issue 16, Pages 7617-7633

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00855

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health [R01GM103893]
  2. AbbVie
  3. Bayer Pharma AG
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim
  5. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  6. Eshelman Institute for Innovation
  7. Genome Canada
  8. Innovative Medicines Initiative (EU/EFPIA) [ULTRA-DD grant] [115766]
  9. Janssen
  10. Merck Co.
  11. Novartis Pharma AG
  12. Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  13. Pfizer
  14. Sao Paulo Research Foundation-FAPESP
  15. Takeda
  16. Wellcome Trust
  17. SGC
  18. Medicinal Chemistry Division of the American Chemical Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

EZH2 or EZH1 (enhancer of zeste homologue 2 or 1) is the catalytic subunit of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) that catalyzes methylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27). PRC2 hyperactivity and/or hypertrimethylation of H3K27 are associated with numerous human cancers, therefore inhibition of PRC2 complex has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach. Recent studies have shown that EZH2 and EZH1 are not functionally redundant and inhibition of both EZH2 and EZH1 is necessary to block the progression of certain cancers such as mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL)-rearranged leukemias. Despite the significant advances in discovery of EZH2 inhibitors, there has not been a systematic structure activity relationship (SAR) study to investigate the selectivity between EZH2 and EZH1 inhibition. Here, we report our SAR studies that focus on Modifications to various regions of the EZH2/1 inhibitor UNC1999 (5) to investigate the impact of the structural changes on EZH2 and EZH1 inhibition and selectivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available