4.7 Review

Recycling of spent Lithium-ion Batteries: A comprehensive review for identification of main challenges and future research trends

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102447

Keywords

Battery management; Lithium-ion batteries; Recycling; Sustainability; Efficiency

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52075303, 52075307]
  2. Shandong Provincial Key R D Program [2019GHZ016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides a comprehensive review on the existing methods, key issues, and technical challenges in the field of recycling spent lithium-ion batteries (SLIBs). It systematically explains the pretreatment process, leaching process, chemical purification process, and industrial applications. Future research opportunities and managerial insights are discussed to introduce smart, intelligent, and sustainable recycling of SLIBs.
With the rapid development of electric vehicles, the disposal of retired lithium batteries is a grand challenge for the waste management based on reliability, efficiency and sustainability criteria. Majority of studies in the literature review, have focused on the minimization of environmental pollution while maximizing economic profits. However, the literature is still in favor of different reliability, efficiency and sustainability criteria which are urgent and essential for the recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries (SLIBs). To this end, this study does a comprehensive review on existing methods, key issues, and technical challenges in the field of SLIBs recycling. The significant contributions of this work are to systematically explain the pretreatment process, leaching process, chemical purification process, and industrial applications. Finally, future research opportunities and managerial insights in the field of SLIBs recycling are discussed while introducing smart, intelligent and sustainable recycling of SLIBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available