4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Heat transfer distribution and flow characteristics in a channel with perforated-baffles

Journal

ENERGY REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 420-426

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.079

Keywords

Heat transfer enhancement; Multiple impinging jets; Perforated-baffle with square wings; Perforated-baffle; Transverse solid baffle

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the prediction of heat transfer performance in a channel with a modified perforated-baffle design. Numerical simulations show the flow/temperature field, local heat transfer distribution, and thermal performance of the channel with different types of baffles. The results reveal that lower friction losses are more important for improving thermal performance than higher heat transfer rates.
The current paper reports the prediction of heat transfer performance of a channel with a modified perforated-baffle in a square wings (SW-PB) form. Numerical results include flow/temperature field, local heat transfer distribution, and thermal performance of a channel installed with the transverse solid baffle (TB), perforated-baffle (PB), and perforated-baffle with square wings (SW-PB). The simulation results demonstrated that TB brought a large recirculation flow, PB induced small recirculation and SW-PB produced several impinging jets as well as recirculation flows. Heat transfer rates given by PB were lower than those provided by TB and SW-PB by around 6.8% and 7.3%, respectively which were accompanied by lower friction losses by about 11.8% and 3.6%, respectively. Although, SW-PB gave higher heat transfer, the assessment of thermal performance factor (TPF) showed that the benefit from lower friction losses was more important. Under the same pumping power, TPFs assisted by SW-PB were higher than that assisted by PB and TB by 6.0% and 3.3%, respectively. The highest TPF of 1.2 was captured by SW-PB at Re = 9,000. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available