4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Pre-split blasting design to reduce costs and improve safety in underground mining

Journal

ENERGY REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 1208-1225

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.07.109

Keywords

Blast; Costs; Design; Pre-split blasting; Tunnel support; Contour quality

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The controlled blasting technique proposed in this study effectively reduces overbreaking in underground mining development galleries, leading to cost reduction and improved physical stability. The study demonstrates the importance of geomechanical studies in determining rock quality for drilling mesh design and explosive selection, resulting in minimal damage to the mining work. Simulation with software optimizes parameters and reveals significant reduction in excess excavation and support costs.
To control the overbreaking of an underground mining development gallery, the controlled blasting technique was proposed and as a result it was possible to reduce costs and improve the physical stability of the periphery of the opening, achieving greater safety for personnel and equipment. With the support of the geomechanical studies, the rock quality of the advancing front was determined, serving for the design of the drilling mesh and the choice and distribution of the explosives in the respective drills. This study demonstrates that it is possible to make progress in efficient mining preparation and development work, achieving minimal damage to the roof and walls of the mining work. Performing the simulation with the software determines a difference between conventional blasting with the design of the pre-cut technique, optimizing the parameters of the perforation mesh, selection of the explosive charge, the order of detonation. As a result, the study found a 60%-70% reduction in excess excavation, showing a better finish of the tunnel contour, yielding a 16% reduction in support costs. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available