4.6 Article

4E analysis of a SOFC-CCHP system with a LiBr absorption chiller

Journal

ENERGY REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 5284-5295

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.202

Keywords

CCHP; SOFC; Absorption chiller; 4E analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFB1506300]
  2. Na-tional Natural Science Foundation of China [52076096]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province, China [2020CFA040, 2020010601012205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates a new system that combines cooling, heating, and power using a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) with a LiBr absorption chiller and water tank. The study evaluates the influence of the working conditions of the SOFC on its performance and also considers the effects of the working conditions of the stack and absorption chillers.
A new system which combined cooling, heating and power (CCHP) and based on a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) with a LiBr absorption chiller and water tank is investigated. The influence of the working conditions of the SOFC on its steady-state and dynamic performances are studied. Meanwhile, the effects of working conditions of the stack and absorption chillers on multi-criteria assessments are also studied. The result shows that the operating temperature and current density can greatly affect the performance of the stack and system, which can also be influenced by the working conditions of the absorption chiller simultaneously. Increasing the operating temperature can greatly increase the electrical power, and the thermal power will be reduced correspondingly. Increasing the mass flows of the cooling, chilled and hot waters increase the cooling power and coefficient of performance (COP), thereby reducing the heating power. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available