4.7 Article

Functional Analysis of Human Cytomegalovirus UL/b′ Region Using SCID-hu Mouse Model

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 88, Issue 8, Pages 1417-1426

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.24484

Keywords

cytomegalovirus; mutation; genetic mapping; recombinant virus

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [AI050709]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) attenuated strains, Towne, and AD169, differ from prototypic pathogenic strains, such as Toledo, in that they are missing a similar to 15-kb segment in the UL/b' region. In contrast to the attenuated strains, Toledo can replicate in human tissue implants in SCID (SCID-hu) mice. Thus, this model provides a unique in vivo system to study the mechanism of viral pathogenesis. Twenty-two ORFs have been annotated in the UL/b' region, including tissue-tropic genes encoded in a pentameric gH/gl complex. To differentiate the role of the pentameric gH/gl complex versus the functions of other ORFs in the 15-kb region in supporting viral growth in vivo, a series of recombinant viral strains were constructed and their ability to replicate in SCID-hu mice was tested. The mutations in the Towne and AD169 strains were repaired to restore their pentameric gH/gl complex and it was found that these changes did not rescue their inability to replicate in the SCID-hu mice. Subsequently four deletion viruses (D1, D2, D3, and D4) in the 15-kb region from the Toledo strain were created. It was demonstrated that D2 and D3 were able to grow in SCID-hu mice, while D1 and D4 were not viable. Interestingly, co-infection of the implant with the D1 and D4 viruses could compensate their respective growth defect in vivo. The results demonstrated that rescuing viral epithelial tropism is not sufficient to revert the attenuation phenotype of AD169 or Towne, and pathogenic genes are located in the segments missing in D1 and D4 viruses. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available