4.7 Review

Overcoming technological barriers in microfluidics: Leakage testing

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.958582

Keywords

microfluidics; biomedical devices; leakage testing; standards; pressure decay; mechanical integrity; liquid; gas leak

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT)
  2. Research Unit INESC MN
  3. pluriannual BASE and PROGRAMATICO [UID/05367/2020]
  4. FCT
  5. Euramet [PTDC-FIS-PLA/31055/2017]
  6. EMPIR programme [18HLT08 MeDD II, 20NRM02 MFMET]
  7. European Union
  8. NIST on a Chip Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The miniaturization of laboratory procedures for LoC devices and translation to various platforms is revolutionizing the life sciences and biomedical fields. However, there is a lack of established standard test methods to validate manufacturing steps, performance, and safety of microfluidic devices. Leakage testing is a key area that requires consensus guidelines due to the unique challenges posed by microfluidic systems. Quantitative metrics and application-specific test methods are needed to ensure quality assurance and effectively characterize leakage. Establishing leakage test standards will facilitate device commercialization in the field of microfluidics.
The miniaturization of laboratory procedures for Lab-on-Chip (LoC) devices and translation to various platforms such as single cell analysis or Organ-on-Chip (OoC) systems are revolutionizing the life sciences and biomedical fields. As a result, microfluidics is becoming a viable technology for improving the quality and sensitivity of critical processes. Yet, standard test methods have not yet been established to validate basic manufacturing steps, performance, and safety of microfluidic devices. The successful development and widespread use of microfluidic technologies are greatly dependent on the community's success in establishing widely supported test protocols. A key area that requires consensus guidelines is leakage testing. There are unique challenges in preventing and detecting leaks in microfluidic systems because of their small dimensions, high surface-area to volume ratios, low flow rates, limited volumes, and relatively high-pressure differentials over short distances. Also, microfluidic devices often employ heterogenous components, including unique connectors and fluid-contacting materials, which potentially make them more susceptible to mechanical integrity failures. The differences between microfluidic systems and traditional macroscale technologies can exacerbate the impact of a leak on the performance and safety on the microscale. To support the microfluidics community efforts in product development and commercialization, it is critical to identify common aspects of leakage in microfluidic devices and standardize the corresponding safety and performance metrics. There is a need for quantitative metrics to provide quality assurance during or after the manufacturing process. It is also necessary to implement application-specific test methods to effectively characterize leakage in microfluidic systems. In this review, different methods for assessing microfluidics leaks, the benefits of using different test media and materials, and the utility of leakage testing throughout the product life cycle are discussed. Current leakage testing protocols and standard test methods that can be leveraged for characterizing leaks in microfluidic devices and potential classification strategies are also discussed. We hope that this review article will stimulate more discussions around the development of gas and liquid leakage test standards in academia and industry to facilitate device commercialization in the emerging field of microfluidics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available