4.4 Article

Solving a real-world large-scale cutting stock problem: A clustering-assignment-based model

Journal

IISE TRANSACTIONS
Volume 55, Issue 11, Pages 1160-1173

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2022.2133196

Keywords

Furniture production; large-scale cutting stock; material batch feed; material substitutability; iterative heuristic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study addresses the optimization problem in furniture manufacturing through problem formulation and iterative heuristic algorithm. The researchers have successfully found efficient and stable solutions, leading to significant reduction in costs and waste in practical scenarios.
This study stems from a furniture factory producing products by cutting and splicing operations. We formulate the problem into an assignment-based model, which reflects the problem accurately, but is intractable, due to a large number of binary variables and severe symmetry in the solution space. To overcome these drawbacks, we reformulate the problem into a clustering-assignment-based model (and its variation), which provides lower (upper) bounds of the assignment-based model. According to the classification of the board types, we categorize the instances into three cases: Narrow Board, Wide Board, and Mixed Board. We prove that the clustering-assignment-based model can obtain the optimal schedule for the original problem in the Narrow Board case. Based on the lower and upper bounds, we develop an iterative heuristic to solve instances in the other two cases. We use industrial data to evaluate the performance of the iterative heuristic. On average, our algorithm can generate high-quality solutions within a minute. Compared with the greedy rounding heuristic, our algorithm has obvious advantages in terms of computational efficiency and stability. From the perspective of the total costs and practical metrics, our method reduces costs by 20.90% and cutting waste by 4.97%, compared with a factory's method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available