4.4 Article

FIPvarchical modeling of microstructural images for porosity prediction in metal additive manufacturing via two-point correlation function

Journal

IISE TRANSACTIONS
Volume 55, Issue 9, Pages 957-969

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2022.2115593

Keywords

Additive manufacturing; two-point correlation function; Bayesian hierarchical model; blocked Gibbs sampling; porosity prediction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, a modeling approach is proposed for predicting porosity and reconstructing microstructure in additive manufacturing. The Two-Point Correlation Function is used to quantitatively capture the morphology of pores and establish their relationship with process parameters. The results demonstrate the effectiveness and advantageous features of this method in both simulation studies and real-world applications.
Porosity is one of the most critical quality issues in Additive Manufacturing (AM). As process parameters are closely related to porosity formation, it is vitally important to study their relationship for better process optimization. In this article, motivated by the emerging application of metal AM, a three-level hierarchical mixed-effects modeling approach is proposed to characterize the relationship between microstructural images and process parameters for porosity prediction and microstructure reconstruction. Specifically, a Two-Point Correlation Function (TPCF) is used to capture the morphology of the pores quantitatively. Then, the relationship between the TPCF profile and process parameters is established. A blocked Gibbs sampling approach is developed for parameter inference. Our modeling framework can reconstruct the microstructure based on the predicted TPCF through a simulated annealing optimization algorithm. The effectiveness and advantageous features of our method are demonstrated by both the simulation study and the case study with real-world data from metal AM applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available