4.0 Review

Building better pediatric surgeons: A sentiment analysis of online physician review websites

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS ORTHOPAEDICS
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 498-504

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/18632521221133812

Keywords

Physician review websites; natural language processing; sentiment analysis; patient satisfaction; pediatric orthopedic surgeons

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uses sentiment analysis to examine how specific patient sentiments correspond to positive and negative experiences in online reviews of pediatric orthopedic surgeons. The results show that younger surgeons, effective communication, pain relief, and a welcoming office environment are positively associated with receiving positive online reviews. These findings provide guidance for pediatric surgeons in terms of their behavior and office quality.
Purpose: Physician review websites are a heavily utilized patient tool for finding, rating, and reviewing surgeons. Natural language processing such as sentiment analysis provides a comprehensive approach to better understand the nuances of patient perception. This study utilizes sentiment analysis to examine how specific patient sentiments correspond to positive and negative experiences in online reviews of pediatric orthopedic surgeons. Methods: The online written reviews and star ratings of pediatric surgeons belonging to the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America were obtained from . A sentiment analysis package obtained compound scores of each surgeon's reviews. Inferential statistics analyzed relationships between demographic variables and star/sentiment scores. Word frequency analyses and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed on key terms. Results: A total of 749 pediatric surgeons (3830 total online reviews) were included. 80.8% were males and 33.8% were below 50 years of age. Male surgeons and younger surgeons had higher mean star ratings. Surgeon attributes including confident (p < 0.01) and comfortable (p < 0.01) improved the odds of positive reviews, while rude (p < 0.01) and unprofessional (p < 0.01) decreased these odds. Comments regarding pain lowered the odds of positive reviews (p < 0.01), whereas pain-free increased these odds (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Pediatric surgeons who were younger, communicated effectively, eased pain, and curated a welcoming office setting were more likely to receive positively written online reviews. This suggests that a spectrum of interpersonal and ancillary factors impact patient experience and perceptions beyond surgical skill. These outcomes can advise pediatric surgeons on behavioral and office qualities that patients and families prioritize when rating/recommending surgeons online.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available