4.7 Article

The Free-Living Nematodes as Indicators of the Soil Quality in Relation to the Clay Content, When Coffee Waste Is Applied

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12112702

Keywords

coffee waste; organic matter; soil free-living nematode community; enrichment; depletion; Panagrolaimus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coffee waste, as an organic amendment, has a positive effect on soil free-living nematode communities, especially in sandy loam soil. The genus Panagrolaimus shows potential for describing soil quality differentiations.
Coffee waste is an organic material that can potentially be used in agricultural systems as an organic amendment. This study investigated the effects of the application of three concentrations of coffee waste (1%, 2%, and 4% w/v), used as an organic amendment, on soil free-living nematode communities, and in two different soil types (clay and sandy loam). Coffee waste incorporation did not appear to be toxic to the soil's free-living nematodes; on the contrary, it favored the nematode populations; this increase was greater in the sandy loam soil type. Our results show that the abundance of the cp-1 bacteria-feeding nematodes can be used as an indicator of the soil's enrichment or depletion phase. Panagrolaimus was the most promising genus to describe quality differentiations that occur in the soil system. Three months after coffee waste application, Panagrolaimus was found to be dominant in all coffee waste applications, indicating that the soil was in a phase of enrichment. Six months after the application, nematode community structure indices (enrichment and structure) showed that coffee waste was decomposed in the 1 and 2% treatments and that these systems were in a stage of nutrient depletion. In terms of agricultural practices, when a coffee waste dose is lesser than 4%, a second application is recommended before 6 months to avoid soil degradation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available